On Monday 06 of January 2014 17:14:48 Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On 19 December 2013 17:15, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rahul, > > > > On Friday 06 of December 2013 21:26:30 Rahul Sharma wrote: > >> Add support for pll2650xx in samsung pll file. This pll variant > >> is close to pll36xx but uses CON2 registers instead of CON1. > > > > If the ops are otherwise idential, why not reuse the ops for pll36xx > > and use CON1 or CON2 register conditionally based on pll->type field? > > (Just as it is already done for pll4600, 4650 and 4650c.) > > > > I verified the difference and found that pll2650xx is fairly > different in terms of > Bit Fields, Con2 register, and additional PLL config bits than pll36xx. Due to > this, I have to add lot of if-else code based on pll type which > doesn't looks clean. Fair enough. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |