Tomasz,
On 10 December 2013 21:34, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Young-Gun, Pankaj, Rahul, Arun,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> On Friday 06 of December 2013 21:26:26 Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> From: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add Samsung Exynos5260 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl
>> support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5260.
> [snip]
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> index 155b1b3..9a93df6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> @@ -1042,6 +1042,88 @@ struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5250_pin_ctrl[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +/* pin banks of exynos5260 pin-controller 0 */
>> +static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5260_pin_banks0[] = {
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x020, "gpa1", 0x04),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x040, "gpa2", 0x08),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x060, "gpb0", 0x0c),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x080, "gpb1", 0x10),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x0A0, "gpb2", 0x14),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x0C0, "gpb3", 0x18),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x0E0, "gpb4", 0x1c),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x100, "gpb5", 0x20),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x120, "gpd0", 0x24),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x140, "gpd1", 0x28),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x160, "gpd2", 0x2c),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x180, "gpe0", 0x30),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x1A0, "gpe1", 0x34),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x1C0, "gpf0", 0x38),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x1E0, "gpf1", 0x3c),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(2, 0x200, "gpk0", 0x40),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC00, "gpx0", 0x00),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC20, "gpx1", 0x04),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC40, "gpx2", 0x08),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xC60, "gpx3", 0x0c),
>
> nit: Please use lowercase hexadecimal characters. Despite of already
> existing code, lowercase is the preferred way.
>
Changed.
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* pin banks of exynos5260 pin-controller 1 */
>> +static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5260_pin_banks1[] = {
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x000, "gpc0", 0x00),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x020, "gpc1", 0x04),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x040, "gpc2", 0x08),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x060, "gpc3", 0x0c),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x080, "gpc4", 0x10),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* pin banks of exynos5260 pin-controller 2 */
>> +static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5260_pin_banks2[] = {
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x000, "gpz0", 0x00),
>> + EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x020, "gpz1", 0x04),
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Samsung pinctrl driver data for Exynos5260 SoC. Exynos5420 SoC includes
>> + * four gpio/pin-mux/pinconfig controllers.
>
> Hmm, I can see only three of them below. Is there one left undefined?
There are only three. I updated the comment.
regards,
Rahul Sharma
>
> Otherwise, the patch looks fine.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
