On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2013/10/4 Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 2013/10/2 Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> This patch adds code to look for the ptn3460 in the device tree file on
>>>> exynos initialization. If ptn node is found, the driver will initialize
>>>> the ptn3460 driver and skip creating a DP connector (since the bridge
>>>> driver will register its own connector).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_core.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_core.c
>>>> index 1bef6dc..9cf4476 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_core.c
>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
>>>> * option) any later version.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_i2c.h>
>>>> #include <drm/drmP.h>
>>>> +#include <drm/bridge/ptn3460.h>
>>>> #include "exynos_drm_drv.h"
>>>> #include "exynos_drm_encoder.h"
>>>> #include "exynos_drm_connector.h"
>>>> @@ -20,6 +22,40 @@
>>>>
>>>> static LIST_HEAD(exynos_drm_subdrv_list);
>>>>
>>>> +struct bridge_init {
>>>> + struct i2c_client *client;
>>>> + struct device_node *node;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static bool find_bridge(const char *name, struct bridge_init *bridge)
>>>> +{
>>>> + bridge->client = NULL;
>>>> + bridge->node = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name);
>>>
>>> Not clear to me. Why do you try to handle device tree here, not real
>>> device driver?. How about adding a output property to board specific
>>> fimd dt node: i.e. output = <&ptn3460_bridge>?
>>
>> The problem doing something like this is that we won't have a handle
>> to drm_device if it's just a standalone driver, and so we won't be
>> able to register the bridge or connector. We need this init call one
>> way or another.
>>
>
> At least, dt binding shoul be done in real device driver so this way
> is not good. Let's find a better way.
>
Right, so this is kind of tricky. If you do it in a "real" device
driver, you end up parsing the dt stuff in the probe, and then racing
the init callback. I figured it would be best just to do everything in
one place without races.
Hopefully I'm just missing a good way to solve this problem, any concrete ideas?
>>
>>> Actually, the output
>>> device of fimd hw could be one of MIPI-DSI, eDP, mDNIe, LVDS bridge,
>>> or LCD. And then, let's find ptn3460-bridge node in the fimd driver,
>>> and initialize the ptn3460 bridge driver, and get power on or off
>>> through exynos_drm_display_ops of the fimd driver. And all these
>>> codes could be hided from fimd driver by moving them into
>>> exynos_drm_display_ops. Of course, for this, you would need additional
>>> works. So let's do it if needed.
>>>
>>> The below is the outline of device tree I recommend,
>>>
>>> In board dts,
>>> i2c@I2CD000 {
>>> ptn3460_bridge: prn3460-bridge@20 {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> fimd@11c00000 {
>>> ...
>>> output_dev = <&ptn3460_bridge>;
>>> }
>>>
>>> With this, I believe that you can do all things you want for
>>> controlling the LVDS bridge in fimd driver.
>>>
>>
>> No, this isn't what I want to do. The bridge should not hang off fimd
>> since it's a crtc. The bridge should only be initialized by the DP
>> driver (it doesn't make sense to initialize ptn when you're using
>> MIPI/LVDS/whatever).
>
> I don't mean that the bridge device should be initialized by fimd
> directly but the fimd driver provides just interfaces abstracted to
> control the bridge device. And basically, the exynos_drm_display_ops
> shouldn't be in fimd driver but in real connector driver; i.e. lcd
> panel or LVDS driver. The reason I placed the exynos_drm_display_ops
> in fimd driver is that lcd panel driver is controlled by lcd class
> depended on Linux framebuffer, and I thought the panel driver should
> be shared with drm driver in case of ARM SoC. The
> exynos_drm_display_ops should be moved into right place if something
> better exists some time or other.
>
> So how can the DP driver control the bridge device as of now? the DP
> you mentioned would be eDP, and the eDP driver is placed in
> drivers/video/exynos/, and also MIPI-DSI driver.
>
It can't. The DP driver just operates on its own and display either
comes up or it doesn't depending on whether fimd happens to be
initialized first. As I mentioned earlier, I have a patch set which
moves DP driver into drm/exynos and removes the display_ops from fimd.
That will fix this issue.
Sean
>>
>> Since the actual crtc/encoder drivers are abstracted through
>> exynos_drm_core/crtc/encoder, we need to initialize the ptn driver in
>> the abstraction layers in order to hook it directly into drm.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Inki Dae
>>>
>>>> + if (!bridge->node)
>>>> + return false;
>>>> +
>>>> + bridge->client = of_find_i2c_device_by_node(bridge->node);
>>>> + if (!bridge->client)
>>>> + return false;
>>>> +
>>>> + return true;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/* returns the number of bridges attached */
>>>> +static int exynos_drm_attach_lcd_bridge(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>> + struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct bridge_init bridge;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (find_bridge("ptn3460-bridge", &bridge)) {
>>>> + ret = ptn3460_init(dev, encoder, bridge.client, bridge.node);
>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>> + return 1;
>>>> + }
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int exynos_drm_create_enc_conn(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>> struct exynos_drm_subdrv *subdrv)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -36,6 +72,13 @@ static int exynos_drm_create_enc_conn(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>> DRM_ERROR("failed to create encoder\n");
>>>> return -EFAULT;
>>>> }
>>>> + subdrv->encoder = encoder;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (subdrv->manager->display_ops->type == EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD) {
>>>> + ret = exynos_drm_attach_lcd_bridge(dev, encoder);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * create and initialize a connector for this sub driver and
>>>> @@ -48,7 +91,6 @@ static int exynos_drm_create_enc_conn(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>> goto err_destroy_encoder;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - subdrv->encoder = encoder;
>>>> subdrv->connector = connector;
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
