Re: [PATCH] clockevent: exynos_mct: fix lockdep warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/26/2013 12:32 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,

On Thursday 26 of September 2013 02:39:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/25/2013 04:49 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
This patch moves request_irq() out of cpu notifier callback
to fix below lockdep warning:

[    0.249513] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.249525] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/lockdep.c:2740 lockdep_trace_alloc+0xc8/0x10c()
[    0.249534] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
[    0.249538] Modules linked in:
[    0.249548] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1-next-20130923+ #338
[    0.249564] [<c00165d0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [<c0012b48>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
[    0.249577] [<c0012b48>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c04ebf0c>] (dump_stack+0x74/0xb4)
[    0.249591] [<c04ebf0c>] (dump_stack+0x74/0xb4) from [<c00237a8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x9c)
[    0.249604] [<c00237a8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x9c) from [<c0023888>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
[    0.249615] [<c0023888>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [<c007f194>] (lockdep_trace_alloc+0xc8/0x10c)
[    0.249626] [<c007f194>] (lockdep_trace_alloc+0xc8/0x10c) from [<c01173b0>] (kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x38/0x2
24)
[    0.249638] [<c01173b0>] (kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x38/0x224) from [<c006bc4c>] (request_threaded_irq+0x90/0x130)
[    0.249651] [<c006bc4c>] (request_threaded_irq+0x90/0x130) from [<c0408c60>] (exynos4_local_timer_setup+0xdc/0x140)
[    0.249663] [<c0408c60>] (exynos4_local_timer_setup+0xdc/0x140) from [<c0408d78>] (exynos4_mct_cpu_notify+0x40/0xb0)
[    0.249675] [<c0408d78>] (exynos4_mct_cpu_notify+0x40/0xb0) from [<c04f4e18>] (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x78)
[    0.249688] [<c04f4e18>] (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x78) from [<c004abb0>] (__raw_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x2c)
[    0.249700] [<c004abb0>] (__raw_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x2c) from [<c0023908>] (__cpu_notify+0x3c/0x58)
[    0.249713] [<c0023908>] (__cpu_notify+0x3c/0x58) from [<c0023944>] (cpu_notify+0x20/0x24)
[    0.249725] [<c0023944>] (cpu_notify+0x20/0x24) from [<c002407c>] (notify_cpu_starting+0x58/0x60)
[    0.249737] [<c002407c>] (notify_cpu_starting+0x58/0x60) from [<c00143cc>] (secondary_start_kernel+0xec/0x13
8)
[    0.249748] [<c00143cc>] (secondary_start_kernel+0xec/0x138) from [<40008664>] (0x40008664)
[    0.249767] ---[ end trace 3406ff24bd97382e ]---

Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>
---

Tomasz, what do you think ?

This is a fix that we may want to have, but it must be modified to take
my regression fix[1] into account.

[1] clocksource: exynos_mct: Set IRQ affinity when the CPU goes online
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/22511/focus=23418

Ok, as the clockevents fixes PR for 3.12-rc2 has already been sent, this patch will go to next round of fixes.


--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux