Hi Sylwester, Am Sonntag, den 15.09.2013, 22:58 +0200 schrieb Sylwester Nawrocki: > Hi Philipp, > > On 09/13/2013 03:08 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 13.09.2013, 14:56 +0200 schrieb Sylwester Nawrocki: > [...] > >> @@ -865,6 +793,7 @@ static int queue_init(void *priv, struct vb2_queue *src_vq, struct vb2_queue *ds > >> dst_vq->ops =&m2mtest_qops; > >> dst_vq->mem_ops =&vb2_vmalloc_memops; > >> dst_vq->timestamp_type = V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_COPY; > >> + dst_vq->lock =&ctx->dev->dev_mutex; > >> > >> return vb2_queue_init(dst_vq); > >> } > >> @@ -945,6 +874,7 @@ static int m2mtest_open(struct file *file) > >> kfree(ctx); > >> goto open_unlock; > >> } > >> + ctx->fh.m2m_ctx = ctx->m2m_ctx; > > > > Since you added m2m_ctx to v4l2_fh, why not drop ctx->m2m_ctx altogether > > and always use ctx->fh.m2m_ctx instead? > > Yes, that might make it a bit cleaner. I guess I wanted to minimize > the necessary changes. You are right. Converting the coda driver, I notice that depending on how many occurences of ctx->m2m_ctx there are, it might be better to do this in a separate patch. > I'll amend that in all drivers in this series > for the next iteration, as they all look very similar. Thanks for the > suggestion. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |