On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:16:59PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > On 09/10/2013 02:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:24:01PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > >>For 16kB buffer upload time is reduced from ~90ms to ~80ms (I tested > >>with S5C73M3 355560B transfer). If you think that performance > >>increase isn't valuable we should skip that patch. > >That does seem worthwhile. Is that just a single transfer in isolation? > I gave you summary time when firmware is transferred via 22x16kB blocks. > Each transfer was isolated. OK, so that's the per-transfer number? I'm just wondering if moving it to prepare/unprepare would achieve the same effect here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
