Re: [RFC Patch v2 1/3] clk: add support for temporary parent clock migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chander,

On 09/03/2013 01:34 PM, Chander Kashyap wrote:
Some platforms use to migrate temporarily to another parent during cpu frequency
scaling, e.g. Exynos and Tegra. Once the frequency is changed the latch on to
original parent.

The generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver use clk_set_rate API to scale cpu frequency.
This patch is an attempt to address the above mentioned requirement.

This is achieved as follows:

Add a clk flag "CLK_SET_RATE_TEMP_PARENT" for clocks which need to migrate to
another parent during set_rate operation on them.

Add "temp_parent_name" and "tmp_parent" fields to clk structure i.e the name of
temp_parent_clock and reference to temp_parent_clock.

Hence in clk_set_rate API check for the "CLK_SET_RATE_TEMP_PARENT" flag, then
latch on to alternate parent clock temporarily. Once the requested rate is set
on the clk, re-parent back to original parent clock.

Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap<chander.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/clk/clk-mux.c        |   13 +++++++------
  drivers/clk/clk.c            |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  include/linux/clk-private.h  |   19 +++++++++++--------
  include/linux/clk-provider.h |   10 ++++++----
  4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
index 4f96ff3..854b3ac 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_mux_ro_ops);

  struct clk *clk_register_mux_table(struct device *dev, const char *name,
  		const char **parent_names, u8 num_parents, unsigned long flags,
-		void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u32 mask,
-		u8 clk_mux_flags, u32 *table, spinlock_t *lock)
+		const char *temp_parent_name, void __iomem *reg, u8 shift,
+		u32 mask, u8 clk_mux_flags, u32 *table, spinlock_t *lock)

I'm not sure this is a good idea to split the changes like this. Applying
this patch alone would cause a build break, wouldn't it ?

The users need to be updated in same patch, so patch 2/3 should be normally
folded into this one.

[...]
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 2db08c0..0e29a5b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1425,8 +1425,8 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *clk)
   */
  int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
  {
-	struct clk *top, *fail_clk;
-	int ret = 0;
+	struct clk *top, *fail_clk, *parent = NULL;
+	int ret = 0, index;

  	if (!clk)
  		return 0;
@@ -1450,6 +1450,35 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
  		goto out;
  	}

+	/* Latch on to alternate parent temporarily if needed */
+	if ((clk->flags&  CLK_SET_RATE_TEMP_PARENT)&&  clk->temp_parent_name) {
+		/* Save current parent before latching on to alternate parent */
+		parent = clk->parent;
+
+		if (!clk->temp_parent) {
+			for (index = 0; index<  clk->num_parents; index++) {
+				if (!strcmp(clk->parent_names[index],
+						clk->temp_parent_name))
+					clk->temp_parent =
+					__clk_lookup(clk->temp_parent_name);
+			}
+
+			if (!clk->temp_parent) {
+				pr_warn("%s: wrong temp_parent_name %s",
+					__func__, clk->temp_parent_name);
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				goto out;
+			}
+		}
+
+		ret = clk_set_parent(clk, clk->temp_parent);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_warn("%s: failed to set %s parent\n",
+				__func__, clk->temp_parent->name);
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
  	/* notify that we are about to change rates */
  	fail_clk = clk_propagate_rate_change(top, PRE_RATE_CHANGE);
  	if (fail_clk) {
@@ -1464,6 +1493,14 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
  	clk_change_rate(top);

  out:
+	/* Reparent back to original parent */
+	if (parent) {
+		ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+		if (ret)
+			pr_warn("%s: failed to set %s parent\n",
+					__func__, parent->name);
+	}
+
  	clk_prepare_unlock();

  	return ret;
[...]
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-private.h b/include/linux/clk-private.h
index 8138c94..b70ba4d 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-private.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-private.h
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct clk {
  #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
  	struct dentry		*dentry;
  #endif
+	const char		*temp_parent_name;
+	struct clk		*temp_parent;

Shouldn't such data rather be on struct clk_mux level ? It's only needed
for _some_ mux clocks, while it's being added for all the clock types.

Or wouldn't just a single "u8 temp_parent_index" field do ? The order of
struct clk::parents and struct clk::parent_names is always same, isn't it ?
Then if, e.g.

parent_names[] = "clk_a", "clk_b", "clk_c";

and "clk_c" is the temporary parent clock name, the corresponding clock
pointer storage is clk->parents[2] ? It could be used instead of
clk->temp_parent, couldn't it ?

--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux