Hi Chander, On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 15:20:40 Chander Kashyap wrote: > On 19 August 2013 00:57, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 08/12/13 15:23, Chander Kashyap wrote: > >> ping > >> > >> On 23 July 2013 15:17, Chander Kashyap<chander.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> ping. > >>> > >>> On 14 June 2013 20:11, Chander Kashyap<chander.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Two cells were used to specify interrupts in mct node, while second > >>>> cell > >>>> always remains unused. Hence use only one cell. > >>>> Suggested by Tomasz Figa. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap<chander.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 19 +++++++++---------- > >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4212.dtsi | 19 +++++++++---------- > >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++------------ > >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 19 +++++++++---------- > >>>> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > >>>> [snip] > > > > Should be updated with regarding Doc. > > Will update the document. Apparently I missed your patch and did the same change for Exynos 4 SoCs in my patch series[1] cleaning up Exynos 4 device tree files a bit. Since in my series it is a part of a more complex change, i.e. moving mct node to exynos4x12.dtsi and update of MCT bindings documentation, would you mind if we could keep with my patch doing this change for Exynos 4 and yours taking care for Exynos 5? The documentation is already being updated in my series, so you could just drop the changes done to exynos4*.dtsi files in next version. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/22207 Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |