Hi Yuvaraj, On Tuesday 27 of August 2013 17:32:52 Yuvaraj Kumar wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:22:31AM +0100, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote: > >> This patch adds the device tree node entries for exynos5420 SOC. > >> Exynos5420 has a different version of DWMMC controller,so a new > >> compatible string is used to distinguish it from the prior SOC's. > >> > >> This patch depends on > >> > >> mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Add a new compatible string for exynos5420 > >> > >> changes since V3: > >> 1.change fifo-depth size from 0x80 to 0x40 > >> 2.Move the below properties > >> > >> a.card-detect-delay > >> b.samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div > >> c.samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing > >> d.samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing > >> > >> from SOC dts to board dts file as suggested by Doug Anderson > >> > >> changes since V2: > >> 1.dropped num-slots property from node as its not required > >> > >> if number of card slots available is 1. > >> > >> 2.Move the below properties > >> > >> a.fifo-depth > >> b.card-detect-delay > >> c.samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div > >> d.samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing > >> e.samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing > >> > >> from board dts to SOC dts,as these are not board specific > >> properties. > >> > >> 3.Updated the binding document exynos-dw-mshc.txt. > >> > >> changes since V1: > >> 1.disable node by status = disabled in SOC file > >> 2.enable node by status = okay in board specific file > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt | 4 ++ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 34 > >> +++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > >> | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt index > >> 6d1c098..25368e8 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt > >> > >> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Required Properties: > >> specific extensions. > >> > >> - "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc": for controllers with Samsung > >> Exynos5250 > >> > >> specific extensions. > >> > >> + - "samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc": for controllers with Samsung > >> Exynos5420 + specific extensions. > >> > >> * samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div: Specifies the divider value for the card > >> interface>> > >> unit (ciu) clock. This property is applicable only for Exynos5 > >> SoC's and > >> > >> @@ -31,6 +33,8 @@ Required Properties: > >> data rate mode operation. Refer notes below for the order of the > >> cells and the valid values. > >> > >> +* bypass-smu: Bypass Security Management Unit of eMMC channel 0 and > >> channel 1. + > > > > Could you elaborate on why this is needed? > > Exynos5420 Mobile Storage Host controller has a Security Management > Unit (SMU) for > channel 0 and channel 1 (mainly for eMMC). This binding property > requires to add a quirk > to bypass SMU as it is not being used yet. This looks like a configuration property, not hardware description to me then. If presence of SMU depends on particular channel, then either the property should be "snps,has-smu" or something like this, to indicate that particular channel supports it and it's up to the driver how to handle this feature. > > Is the SMU broken or not present in some hardware revisions? > > SMU is only present in channel 0 and channel 1,but not in channel 2.So > to distinguish this, > bypass-smu property has been added as quirks in the channel. Also a good question is what you mean with "channel". Is it the whole mshc entity having compatible property or its subnodes aka slots? If it's the former and channel 2 does not have SMU, making it compatible with "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc", then it should be marked as such. In this case the ideal solution would be to determine the SMU quirk only by compatible value. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |