On Thursday 22 of August 2013 12:24:58 Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Yuvaraj,
> >
> > On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 12:13:53 Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> >> This patch adds the device tree node entries for exynos5420 SOC.
> >> Exynos5420 has a different version of DWMMC controller,so a new
> >> compatible string is used to distinguish it from the prior SOC's.
> >
> > What are the difference between both versions? Is there a patch adding
> > the new compatible to the driver somewhere?
>
> Exynos5250 has DWMMC controller of IP version 2.41a
> Exynos5420 has DWMMC controller of IP version 2.50a
> In addition Exynos5420 has Security Management Unit for eMMC.
OK. What about my second question?
> >> changes since V1:
> >> 1.disable node by status = disabled in SOC file
> >> 2.enable node by status = okay in board specific file
> >
> > Ahh, so you fixed this already in this version, thanks. Haven't
> > noticed
> > this patch at first and commented on previous one. Sorry for the
> > noise.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt | 2 ++
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 38
> >>
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> >>
> >> | 36 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt index
> >> 6d1c098..84cd56f 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt
> >>
> >> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Required Properties:
> >> specific extensions.
> >>
> >> - "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc": for controllers with Samsung
> >> Exynos5250
> >>
> >> specific extensions.
> >> + - "samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc": for controllers with Samsung
> >> Exynos5420 + specific extensions.
> >>
> >> * samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div: Specifies the divider value for the card
> >>
> >> interface unit (ciu) clock. This property is applicable only for
> >> Exynos5 SoC's and diff --git
> >> a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts index bafba25..6e65278
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,44 @@
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> + dwmmc0@12200000 {
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> + num-slots = <1>;
> >
> > You don't have to specify this property if there is only one slot.
> > Also are you sure that this is a board specific property?
>
> Yes,If num-slots property is not defined dw_mmc driver assumes 1 slot
> is available.
> I think yes,its a board specific property as number of card slots is
> board dependent.
>
> >> + broken-cd;
> >> + bypass-smu;
> >
> > This property doesn't seem to be documented nor used anywhere.
>
> Sorry. I missed to add in binding document.Will add in next version.
Is there a patch adding support for this property to the driver?
> >> + supports-highspeed;
> >
> > Is it a board specific property?
> >
> >> + fifo-depth = <0x80>;
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> Ideally this can be move to SOC specific dts.But I am just following
> ,already merged smdk5250 board
> dts convensions.
This means that Exynos5250 board dts files need to be fixed as well.
> >> + card-detect-delay = <200>;
> >> + samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
> >> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <0 4>;
> >> + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <0 2>;
> >
> > Are the above three properties really board-specific?
Hmm?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
