On 8 August 2013 04:55, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > It looks like it would require us to redefine .target() to take next_state > instead of target_freq (at least in the acpi-cpufreq case), wouldn't it? If we don't do it, then atleast for few drivers, like acpi-cpufreq, which use index more than just for frequency, we may end up calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() twice. Once in the core and then in driver. I believe this is doable and will post a patch soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |