On 07/23/13 02:07, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tuesday 16 of July 2013 16:09:24 Kukjin Kim wrote:
[...]
+ timer@51000000 {
+ clocks =<&clocks PCLK_PWM>;
+ clocks =<&clock PCLK_PWM>;
And I'm not sure using definition PCLK_PWM is better here...
Care to explain your doubts about it? I think this is fine.
I mean just would be better to use hard coded number here instead of
PCLK_PWM like others.
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html