Hi Arnd, On Thursday 25 July 2013 13:00:49 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 25 July 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 July 2013 20:32:03 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 23 July 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 23 of July 2013 17:14:20 Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > Where would you want to have those phy_address arrays stored? > > > > > > There are no board files when booting with DT. Not even saying > > > > > > that you don't need to use any hacky schemes like this when you > > > > > > have DT that nicely specifies relations between devices. > > > > > > > > > > If everybody agrees DT has a nice scheme for specifying relations > > > > > between devices, why not use that same scheme in the PHY core? > > > > > > > > It is already used, for cases when consumer device has a DT node > > > > attached. In non-DT case this kind lookup translates loosely to > > > > something that is being done in regulator framework - you can't bind > > > > devices by pointers, because you don't have those pointers, so you > > > > need to use device names. > > > > > > Sorry for jumping in to the middle of the discussion, but why does a new > > > framework even bother defining an interface for board files? > > > > > > Can't we just drop any interfaces for platform data passing in the phy > > > framework and put the burden of adding those to anyone who actually > > > needs them? All the platforms we are concerned with here (exynos and > > > omap, plus new platforms) can be booted using DT anyway. > > > > What about non-DT architectures such as MIPS (still widely used in > > consumer networking equipments from what I've heard) ? > > * Vendors of such equipment have started moving on to ARM (e.g. Broadcom > bcm47xx) > * Some of the modern MIPS platforms are now using DT > * Legacy platforms probably won't migrate to either DT or the generic PHY > framework > > I'm not saying that we can't support legacy board files with the common PHY > framework, but I'd expect things to be much easier if we focus on those > platforms that are actively being worked on for now, to bring an end to the > pointless API discussion. Fair enough :-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |