On Tuesday 23 of July 2013 09:55:52 Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > On Monday 22 of July 2013 11:52:26 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi index b7f358a..53e2527 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > - clock: clock-controller@0x10030000 {
> > > + clock: clock-controller@10030000 {
> > >
> > > compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-clock";
> > > reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
> > > #clock-cells = <1>;
> >
> > This looks fine, but please fix commit message - it should be
> > Exynos4210. Also some explanation why this change is needed would be
> > good, even if it's obvious.
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> I'm happy to fixup the $SUBJECT line, but do we really have to enter
> an explanation if it's obvious? Seems a little belt and braces.
It's obvious for us, people working with device tree, but for people that
usually don't it might not be.
Something among following lines would be fine:
This patch removes "0x" prefix from addresses in DT nodes for the sake of
consistency with other nodes and assumed convention.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
