Hi Padmavathi, Andrew, On Wednesday 10 of July 2013 17:41:51 Padmavathi Venna wrote: > From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This allows the input clocks to the Exynos AudioSS block to be specified > via device-tree bindings. Default names will be used when an input clock > is not given. This will be useful when adding support for the > Exynos5420 where the audio bus clock is called "sclk_maudio0" instead of > "sclk_audio0". > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/57833 > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/clk-exynos-audss.txt | 31 > ++++++++++++++++++- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-audss.c | > 28 +++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Well, this is basically how it should be done, but in current state of clock core I can see a problem: can we really rely on the order of clock initialization? I mean, we can't defer initialization of particular clock controller until all external clocks it needs are available, because there is no probing involved here. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html