> From: grundler@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:grundler@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grant Grundler > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2:23 AM > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The current exynos-iommu(System MMU) driver does not work autonomously > > since it is lack of support for power management of peripheral blocks. > ... > > Patch summary: > > [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu/exynos: do not include removed header > > [PATCH v7 2/9] iommu/exynos: add missing cache flush for removed page table entries > > [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/exynos: fix page table maintenance > > [PATCH v7 4/9] iommu/exynos: allocate lv2 page table from own slab > > [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/exynos: change rwlock to spinlock > > [PATCH v7 6/9] clk: exynos5250: add gate clock descriptions of System MMU > > [PATCH v7 7/9] ARM: dts: Add description of System MMU of Exynos SoCs > > [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/exynos: support for device tree > > [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/exynos: add bus notifier for registering System MMU > > Cho, > Of the above patches, nearly all have been applied to chromeos-3.8 > (kernel-next git tree) by Doug Anderson and others. > > AFAICT, the only ones not applied are: > [v7,3/9] iommu/exynos: fix page table maintenance > [v7,6/9] clk: exynos5250: add gate clock descriptions of System MMU > (conflicts in this one) > [v7,7/9] ARM: dts: Add description of System MMU of Exynos SoCs > (depends on 6/9) > > We also already have parts of: > [v7,9/9] iommu/exynos: add bus notifier for registering System MMU > > Some of those are being further discussed but I've lost track now > exactly which ones. > > I'm telling you about chromeos-3.8 status since the adopted changes > have been reviewed (by me and others) are being tested manually here > on several different Samsung Exynos platforms (including 5250 which is > our "snow" platform). Not sure how you should to mark those patches > since they aren't identical to your changes (which apply to post 3.10 > kernels, not 3.8). You might consider splitting those patches out > from the 4 I've listed above to get that series accepted upstream > since the additional review/testing should provide some confidence > those patches are good. > I understand what you are concerning about. Have you applied v6 patchset? I will try to split the patches and make the changes from v6 on top of the v6 patcheset. > cheers, > grant Thank you. Cho KyonogHo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |