Re: [PATCH V2] pci: exynos: split into two parts such as Synopsys part and Exynos part

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:28:05AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:49:43PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
> > [...]
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MVEBU) += pci-mvebu.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pcie-exynos.o
> > 
> > I think we should keep these sorted alphabetically. Also Tegra and
> > Marvell are PCIe controllers but they still use the pci- prefix instead
> > of pcie-. Perhaps it'd be good to keep consistency here? I initially
> > chose pci- because from a software point of view it doesn't matter all
> > that much whether it's PCI or PCIe and because the drivers are part of
> > the PCI subsystem. However if Exynos now uses the pcie- prefix it makes
> > it look like Tegra and Marvell are plain old PCI.
> > 
> 
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> I initially chose 'pci-' prefix such as 'pci-designware.c'.
> 
> However, Pratyush Anand suggested as below:
> "I would suggest to rename it as pcie-designware.c,
> because synopsis pcie and pci controllers are different."
> 
> If you have a good idea, please give it to me. :)

Alternatively the plain old PCI variant could be suffixed -legacy or
similar, but I guess pcie- as a prefix works okay in this case.

However I still think you should sort them properly:

	obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o
	obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pci-exynos.o
	obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MVEBU) += pci-mvebu.o

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux