On Thursday 11 of July 2013 14:01:39 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Thursday 11 of July 2013 12:20:23 Mark Brown wrote: > > > This is a bit of a larger project sadly, there was resistance to doing > > > the DT bindings based on compatible strings using the IP version :( > > > > I'm not sure if this case is related to this problem in any way. I just > > suggested introducing a new include like samsung,exynos5420-i2s, a opposed > > to using samsung,exynos5250-i2s and adding flags, since the I2S in > > Exynos5420 is > Well, it *should* be samsung,i2s-vN where N is the version number of the > IP but documentation on the versioning has been patchy hence this whole > thinng. Oh, the binding for samsung-i2s uses IP versions. Isn't that slightly broken? At least with Samsung bindings, I think we happened to agree on a single convention of naming compatible values after the first SoC in which such block first appeared. I wonder what happened with this i2s binding that made it end up outside this convention. > > the first one to have this TDM or whatever mode. (I'd still like to hear > > what it is...) > > What it *should* be is the option to send more than one audio stream > down a link using time division multiplexing. OK. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |