On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:47:00PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > i2c@12C90000 {
> > - status = "disabled";
> > + wm1811a@11 {
> > + compatible = "wlf,wm1811";
> > + reg = <0x1a>;
> Shouldn't it be reg = <0x11> ? Or wm1811a@1a ?
The @ should change. Though since it's one of the bits of ornamental
noise DT has rules for :/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
