On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote: > OK. Looking forward to it. > > Btw. This leaves us with two things broken: > - sdhci-s3c checks for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212), but does not check > for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412), > - exynos-thermal checks for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412), but does not > check for defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212). > > I think this must be fixed, because selecting only Exynos4212 in kernel > config you end up without exynos-thermal, while selecting only Exynos4412 > breaks sdhci-s3c. I wonder what we actually gain by having all these fine-grained checks in the kernel. Why not just reduce the compile-time checks to just EXYNOS4 and EXYNOS5? The drivers can easily implement code for all variants using run-time checks, but I think it would be easier if building an EXYNOS4 kernel would just run on all EXYNOS4 machines. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html