On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line >> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt >> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the >> handler is not enough. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - Greatly simplified using Tomasz's suggestion of irqd_get_trigger_type >> - Moved acking out of the bank spinlock since since it's not needed. >> - Linus W. has already applied parts 1 and 2, so not resending. > > Thanks, this v2 version applied with Tomasz ACK. As noted this thing exploded due to patch fuzzing. Could you respin this on top of my "devel" branch? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |