On 17 June 2013 16:55, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 'exynos_wkup_irq_ack' should be defined ahead of its call. >> >> Fixes the following error: >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c: In function ‘exynos_wkup_irq_mask’: >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c:299:3: error: implicit declaration of >> function ‘exynos_wkup_irq_ack’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> exynos_wkup_irq_ack(irqd); >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Fixed the commit message. >> --- > > Applied. Thanks. > > Usually you should state which commit caused > the problem in the commit message. Usually I do. But in this case it was not caused by a single commit per se but a combination. Hence I wasn't sure if I should mention both as the ones causing it. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |