Tomasz Figa wrote: > [...] > > > From my understanding how it works, there is no need to list Linus in > > > particular drivers, because he's already listed as a maintainer of the > > > whole pinctrl subsystem and get-maintainer accounts for this. > > > > > > Similarly for Kukjin, he's listed as the main Samsung maintainer > > > already, > > If so, the directory like pinctrl should be added under Samsung ARM > > Architectures like spi and sound for Samsung stuff... > > I don't think so, because it's a part of the pin control subsystem. > Yes right. I mean, pinctrl is clos > > > but AFAIK in this case the script can't infer this based on directory > > > > > structure. Let's see how it's done for other Samsung drivers: > > Well, I don't think so, because pinctrl has the close relationship with > > exynos arch part and it's little bit different with following. Just in > > my understanding. > > I'm not really sure what you mean. Pin control is a separate kernel > subsystem, which shouldn't have any dependencies on arch code. > Yes, right. I have no objection about it is a subsystem. I meant just relationship and it helps people find the overall architecture. [...] > > And I'm asking above all guys _really_ do review and maintaining the > > file or directories? I don't think so. > > I'm not really sure what makes you think they don't. I can see all of them > involved in works on mentioned drivers. > What's the role of maintainer? I mean, as you said, above guys are really do it... - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |