Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 23:18:13 schrieb Tomasz Figa:
> This patch introduces new Samsung PWM driver, which uses Samsung
> PWM/timer master driver to control shared parts of the hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 528
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 529
> insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
[...]
> +static int pwm_samsung_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int ret;
> +
> + chip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (chip == NULL) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate driver data\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + chip->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> + chip->chip.ops = &pwm_samsung_ops;
> + chip->chip.base = -1;
> + chip->chip.npwm = SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM;
> +
> + if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> + ret = pwm_samsung_parse_dt(chip);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + chip->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
> + chip->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
> + } else {
> + if (!pdev->dev.platform_data) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data specified\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&chip->variant, pdev->dev.platform_data,
> + sizeof(chip->variant));
> + }
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!res) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mem resource\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + chip->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> + if (!chip->base) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request and map registers\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + chip->base_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "timers");
> + if (IS_ERR(chip->base_clk)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get timer base clk\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(chip->base_clk);
> + }
> + clk_prepare_enable(chip->base_clk);
> +
> + chip->tclk0 = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pwm-tclk0");
> + chip->tclk1 = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pwm-tclk1");
> +
> + ret = pwmchip_add(&chip->chip);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register pwm\n");
> + goto err_clk_disable;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "base_clk at %lu, tclk0 at %lu, tclk1 at %lu\n",
> + clk_get_rate(chip->base_clk),
> + !IS_ERR(chip->tclk0) ? clk_get_rate(chip->tclk0) : 0,
> + !IS_ERR(chip->tclk1) ? clk_get_rate(chip->tclk1) : 0);
hmm, these values simply tell some internal state of the pwm, so wouldn't a
dev_dbg be more appropriate?
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_clk_disable:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(chip->base_clk);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
