Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Hi Sylwester, > On 06/11/2013 10:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > From: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.m@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Since the pdma works only in secure mode, accessing the same > > in hypervisor mode gives an abort. As we are not using pdma > > anywhere (including spi), removing the same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.m@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > I was wondering, wouldn't it be sufficient to add status = "disabled"; > in those pdma nodes, to avoid re-adding them in future ? Yeah, could be. But the pdma will not be used on exynos5440 in future and if some guy use it in non-secure mode, it will cause problem, so I want to remove that. > As for the DMA properties in the spi device nodes, they should indeed > be removed, as generic DMA bindings would be used instead. > Yes, agreed. So I'd prefer to remove that :-) Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |