On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:13:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday 17 of May 2013 18:24:29 Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> This patch makes legacy code on suspend/resume path being executed > >> conditionally, on non-DT platforms only, to fix suspend/resume of > >> DT-enabled systems, for which the code is inappropriate. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- > >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > It seems like this patch did not make it into 3.10-rc5, while rest of patches > > did, which ended up with suspend/resume still being broken. > > > > What should we do in this case? > > I did not apply this patch to the pinctrl tree because it begins > with ARM: but it appears I promised to carry it anyway... > > I need an ACK from the ARM SoC people to do that though, > or you can take it through ARM SoC fixes directly. > > I would just ask Olof/Arnd to apply it directly as a separate > patch. It makes sense to take this through arm-soc since it's no longer dependent on anything else. Applied to fixes. Please do follow through with the promised cleanups at some point, Tomasz. :-) -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |