Andrew, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think this is supposed to be "xxti" which might or might not be >> "fin_pll". In the exynos4 code these are two different clocks that >> are chosen by OM[0]. I'd bet that 99% of the time they are the same, >> but it seems better to use "xxti". > > OM[0] also appears to mux the input here between "xxti" and "xusbxti" > as well. So this should probably remain "fin_pll". Thanks! ...so I'm OK with this landing "as-is" or a re-spin with nits fixed, since all of the rest of my comments were just nits... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |