On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28 March 2013 13:35, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > +static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > + policy->cur = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
> > + cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(dvfs_info->freq_table, policy->cpu);
> > +
> > + /* set the transition latency value */
> > + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = dvfs_info->latency;
> > +
> > + cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
> > +
> > + return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, dvfs_info->freq_table);
>
> I missed this earlier and saw this mistake in yet another driver.
> You need to call cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr() only when
> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() has passed.
ok. Submitted the V6 version with this change.
>
>
> > +}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
