Hi,
On Monday 01 April 2013 07:24 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Adding APIs to handle runtime power management on PHY
devices. PHY consumers may need to wake-up/suspend PHYs
when they work across autosuspend.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/usb/phy.h | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/usb/phy.h b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
index 6b5978f..01bf9c1 100644
--- a/include/linux/usb/phy.h
+++ b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
@@ -297,4 +297,145 @@ static inline const char *usb_phy_type_string(enum usb_phy_type type)
return "UNKNOWN PHY TYPE";
}
}
+
+static inline void usb_phy_autopm_enable(struct usb_phy *x)
+{
+ if (!x || !x->dev) {
+ dev_err(x->dev, "no PHY or attached device available\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_enable(x->dev);
+}
IMO we need not have wrapper APIs for runtime_enable and runtime_disable
here. Generally runtime_enable and runtime_disable is done in probe and
remove of a driver respectively. So it's better to leave the
runtime_enable/runtime_disable to be done in *phy provider* driver than
having an API for it to be done by *phy user* driver. Felipe, what do
you think?
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
