RE: [PATCH 0/2] These two patches to s3c_pm_arch_prepare_irqs() were part of the work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Doug Anderson wrote:
> 
> to make suspend/resume reliable on the ARM Chromebook
> (exynos5250-snow).
> 
> A few more details:
> - The first patch is not strictly needed but was a nice cleanup.  Our
>   understanding was that EINT0 was originally turned on for exynos
>   evt0 silicon and not needed for evt1.

Looks good to me, applied, thanks.

> - The second patch is more important and (also) more obvious.  The
>   function was modifying the S5P_WAKEUP_MASK register and then
>   clobbering its own modifications.
> 
Applied with 1st one, BTW, do you want to send this for stable tree?

- Kukjin

> For some history, see:
> - https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/31337
> - https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/31341
> 
> 
> Jonathan Kliegman (2):
>   arm: exynos: Remove hardcode wakeup unmask for EINT_0
>   arm: exynos: Clear ENABLE_WAKEUP_SW bit when entering suspend
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/pm-core.h | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 1.8.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux