Re: [PATCH] ARM: timer: Shutdown clock event device when stopping local timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/4/1 Ning Jiang <ning.n.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2013/4/1 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 03/29/2013 10:24 AM, ning.n.jiang@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Ning Jiang <ning.n.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Currently there are two problems when we try to stop local timer.
>>> First, it calls set_mode function directly so mode state is not
>>> updated for the clock event device. Second, it makes the device
>>> unused instead of shutdown.
>>>
>>> A subtle error will happen because of it. When a cpu is plugged out
>>> it will stop the local timer. It will call tick_nohz_idle_enter()
>>> in idle thread afterwards. It will cancel the sched timer and try
>>> to reprogram the next event. This is wrong since the local timer
>>> is supposed to be stopped.
>>>
>>> The right way to stop the local timer is to shutdown it by calling
>>> clockevents_set_mode(). Thus when we try to reprogram the clock
>>> event device, it will return directly without doing anything since
>>> the clock mode is CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ning Jiang <ning.n.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c                |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c               |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c                |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c     |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/clocksource/time-armada-370-xp.c |    2 +-
>>>  5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
>>> index 3f25650..c1d4ab4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
>>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int twd_timer_ack(void)
>>>
>>>  static void twd_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk)
>>>  {
>>> -     twd_set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, clk);
>>> +     clockevents_set_mode(clk, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN);
>>>       disable_percpu_irq(clk->irq);
>>
>> Wouldn't be clockevents_shutdown more adequate here ? The next event
>> will be also set.
>
> You're right. clockevents_shutdown seems more appropriate here. I'll
> submit a revised patch for it.
>

Here attached the revised patch. Any more comments?

Attachment: 0001-ARM-timer-Shutdown-clock-event-device-when-stopping-.patch
Description: Binary data


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux