On 03/18/2013 09:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 03/13/2013 05:42 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> Rob, >> >> On 03/13/2013 03:39 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> I fail to see what the hack is. The order of interrupt properties must >>> be defined by the binding. interrupt-names is auxiliary data and must >>> not be required by an OS. Is that true for all foo-names properties, or only for interrupt-names? I was under the impression that foo-names was specifically invented so that the order of the entries didn't matter, and instead they could be requested by name. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |