Hi Heiko, On Friday 08 of March 2013 15:38:04 Heiko Stübner wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > taking you up on your offer of helping, I would be cool if you could > simply give me a push in the right direction :-) . > > > From what I've seen so far, the bank handling itself is very similar > between exynos and s3c24xx as the underlying structures already handle > multiple widths of the register contents. More interesting is the eint > handling around which I couldn't wrap my head yet. > > The basic structure is again similar with special eint registers, but > adds some quirks. EINT banks are gpf (8 eints) and gpg (8 or 16 eints > depending on the SoC). > > The current way on Exynos seems to be to mark the offset in the eint > register and attach an irq_domain to the bank, which gets mapped to the > eints starting at the offset. The eints seem to have a parent interrupt > that is provided via the dt. > > On the S3C24xx the gpg bank is doing this similar but gpf is very > strange. > > The first half of the bank (gpf0 to gpf3) is not handled in eintpend > registers but in the main interrupt controller (bits 0 to 3), while the > second half of gpf is handled in eintpend. The new interrupt > declaration might show this better, which can be found at [0]. > > An exception is the s3c2412 which adds still another quirk where each > interrupt of gpf0 to gpf3 is represented in both the normal intc and > eint registers, again for reference probably easier to see in [1]. > > > So I'm still quite stumped on how this could fit into the current > framework and would be really glad for some small pointers :-) I wonder if some of my patches for pinctrl on S3C64xx might be helpful: https://github.com/tom3q/linux/commits/v3.8-s3c64xx-dt-pinctrl Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html