Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Dear Thomas Abraham, > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:01:59 +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > On 4 March 2013 15:52, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Exynos5440 has two PCIe controllers which can be used as Root Complex. > > > This driver supports the PCIe controllers as Root Complex mode. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla > <suren.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kallam@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt | 58 ++ > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 + > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 8 + > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 2 + > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/pcie.h | 146 +++ > > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pcie.c | 1009 > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Is there any reason to place this code in arch/arm/...? As you know, > > there is a constant effort to relocate as much code as possible from > > arch/arm/mach-exynos. So there must be a strong justification for > > keeping this code in arch/arm/mach-exynos. > > Indeed. Thierry Reding (doing the Tegra PCIe driver) and myself (doing > the Marvell PCIe driver) are putting our drivers in drivers/pci/host/, > in agreement with the PCI maintainers. > I agree. Jingoo, please move this stuff into drivers/pci when you address comments. Thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |