Thomas, On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ok. I will repost this patch again with pinctrl_1 and pinctrl_2 > included. I had not included this in the earlier patch since I was not > sure of the best pin grouping for the camera and c2c interface. OK, thanks. >>> --> NOTE: Appears (IIRC) to have incorrect interrupt for pinctrl_3. I >>> believe that 45 is pinctrl_1. Maybe 3 is 47? >> >> I can't verify this, unfortunately. > > The documentation does not state this clearly. I will recheck on this > and correct as needed. OK. Let me know if you can't find it. I spent a bunch of time digging in this area and wrote up my findings, but I certainly could be wrong. ;) > I have posted i2c pinctrl support patch based on LinusW's pin grab by > device core patch. If that is acceptable, I can post pinctrl support > patches for other other controllers as well. OK, I see that. <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2212731/>. That particular patch isn't strictly required, right? Even without that patch I can specify pinctrl for the i2c nodes and it will work OK--this just removes the old gpio nodes. One problem I see with taking this approach for DW_MMC and for SPI is that it will make bisecting hard. If you land a change to take out GPIO stuff from dw_mmc and the spi driver then it will make the transition difficult. exynos5 boards will stop booting until the device tree support is also landed. ...and it would be an awfully big patch to add all the device tree stuff in the same patch as the dw_mmc and spi driver changes... -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |