On 02/13/2013 12:51 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Rob / Olof, > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:04:52PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Exynos boot is broken with commit 0529e315 (ARM: use common irqchip_init >>> for GIC init). This commit split the irqchip initialization into 2 calls >>> to of_irq_init. This does not work because of_irq_init requires interrupt >>> parents to be in the match list. >>> >>> Rather than reverting exynos changes, make it do the proper thing by using >>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE. This requires moving the combiner code to drivers/irqchip. >>> >>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> --- >>> >>> I thought there may be other platforms broken in the same way, but I >>> checked and exynos is the only one. >>> >>> This is based on my gic/vic irqchip branch in arm-soc. >> >> Applied to next/cleanup. > > I synced up to next-20130213 and the problem is fixed. :) ...that > label doesn't exactly boot but the problems are unrelated to this > problem now (there are problems with the OF conversions to raw > spinlocks)... > That should be fixed, but may not be in -next yet. It is in Grant's tree. Rob > I haven't done any review of this code (I'm assuming that Olof already > looked it over and Samsung engineers will give it a thorough review), > but it's definitely tested. :) > > Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! > > -Doug > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |