Wolfram,
Thanks for the review. New patch was just sent. :)
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +static int i2c_get_number_from_dt(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>
> i2c_get_id_from_dt()?
Done.
>> + if (!dev->of_node)
>> + return -1;
>
> -ESOMETHING?
Function has been removed, as per below.
>> +
>> + id = of_alias_get_id(dev->of_node, "i2c");
>> + if (id < 0)
>> + return -1;
>> + return id;
>
> Simply 'return of_alias_get_id(...)'? Even more, since this function
> boils down to calling of_alias_get_id only and is only used once, I'd
> think we can implement that directly and drop this function. That
> shouldn't hurt readability.
Good point. Done.
>> +/**
>> + * _i2c_add_numbered_adapter - i2c_add_numbered_adapter where nr is never -1
>> + * @adap: the adapter to register (with adap->nr initialized)
>> + * Context: can sleep
>> + *
>> + * See i2c_add_numbered_adapter() for details.
>> + */
>> +static int _i2c_add_numbered_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>
> All other internal functions are prefixed with '__'.
Done.
>> +{
>> + int id;
>> + int status;
>> +
>> + /* Handled by wrappers */
>> + BUG_ON(adap->nr == -1);
>
> Is that a reason to halt the kernel? WARN and bailing out would do IMO.
Done.
>> +
>> + if (adap->nr & ~MAX_IDR_MASK)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Note the idr-cleanup series from Tejun Heo. Given that his series is
> scheduled for v3.9, I'd like to have your patches on top of his.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
