On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yavaraj, > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already >> being discussing in the mainline. >> This patch provides hooks for the i2c multimaster bus arbitration >> and to have the arbitration parameters. > > > I may have missed something in all the threads, but my recollection was that > the request was that this should be implemented without touching the i2c > core code. Your patch modifies the i2c core code. Different i2c devices will directly talk to i2c core using i2c_transfer(). If we put this out of the i2c core,the i2c devices like tpsxxxx and etc should be registered through the bridge/mux . > > My impression was that the best solution was to use the infrastructure in > place for i2c multiplexing. ...but in your case you would only multiplex > one thing. This was suggested by Grant Likely and seems the cleanest... I agree that Grants idea was the cleanest but we may end up in change in > > -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |