On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:54:01AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Balbi,
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Kishon,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, kishon <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thursday 31 January 2013 09:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:00:37PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Felipe,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:53:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Moreover, SoCs having multiple dwc3 controllers will have multiple
> >>>>>>>> PHYs, which eventually be added using usb_add_phy_dev(), and not
> >>>>>>>> using usb_add_phy(). So each dwc3 controller won't be able to
> >>>>>>>> get PHYs by simply calling devm_usb_get_phy() also.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No. We have added usb_get_phy_dev() for that purpose in the case of
> >>>>>>> non-dt.
> >>>>>>> I think, instead you can have a patch to use devm_usb_get_phy_dev()
> >>>>>>> here and
> >>>>>>> in exynos platform specific code use usb_bind_phy() to bind the phy
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> controller till you change it to dt.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We have dt support for dwc3-exynos, in such case we should go ahead
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>> of_platform_populate(), right ?
> >>>>>> But if when i use of_platform_populate() i will not be able to set
> >>>>>> dma_mask to dwc3->dev. :-(
> >>
> >>
> >> You can do something like this
> >>
> >> static u64 dwc3_exynos_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> >>
> >> static int dwc3_exynos_set_dmamask(struct device *dev, void *c)
> >> {
> >> dev->dma_mask = &dwc3_exynos_dma_mask;
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> And in your probe after of_platform_populate, you can add
> >>
> >> device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, dwc3_exynos_set_dmamask);
> >>
> >> Here pdev is the platform device of dwc3-exynos. By this way all the
> >> children of dwc3-exynos will have dma_mask set to the required value.
> >>
> >
> > Nice idea, thanks :-)
> > hmm.. so i can patch this now, and get things working ;-)
> >
>
> If this is fine with you shall i go ahead and post a patch for the same ? ;-)
should be fine, but we can wait a bit to see if DeviceTree folks reply,
your patch will only go on v3.10 anyway.
cheers
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
