On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30 January 2013 15:18, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Sachin Kamat wrote: >>>> >>>> >> This patch is required along with the >>>> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" >>>> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into >>>> >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up >>>> >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on 4412 based board: >>>> > >>>> > Hm I didn't realize there was a dependency between these >>>> > patches, oh well, better get the pull for the pinctrl tree finished >>>> > off then... > >> >> Torvalds has already pulled it in -> problem solved. :-) >> > > I tested this on Linus T.'s latest tip (2e51b231) and the problem > still persists :( > > You sent the following patch in your pull request to Linus T.: > Kukjin Kim (1): > pinctrl: samsung: removing duplicated condition for PINCTRL_SAMSUNG > > However, the missing dependent patch is: > > "pinctrl: exynos: change PINCTRL_EXYNOS option" Aha how typically chaotical. And that is in the middle of the devel branch that people are basing their development on. Not much to do, I cherry-picked that patch to the fixes branch and hope that git will cope. (It usually does.) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |