When pm handler set freq & voltage, frequency mismatch occurred.
Because freqs.new isn't set in pm handler.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 6d6ba0d..48ee439 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,9 +69,10 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
int ret = 0;
freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = target_freq;
freqs.cpu = policy->cpu;
- if (target_freq == freqs.old)
+ if (freqs.new == freqs.old)
goto out;
/*
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table =
exynos_info->freq_table;
unsigned int index;
+ unsigned int new_freq;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -172,9 +174,9 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
goto out;
}
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
- ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freqs.new);
+ ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(new_freq);
out:
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
