On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:43:31PM +0530, srinidhi kasagar wrote: > Add 'smc' (Secure Monitor Call) identifier to differentiates > the platforms which implements this. This patch makes no sense. So, if setting 'smc' in the DT description is supposed to mean that the platform has a secure monitor then... > + is_smc = of_property_read_bool(np, "smc"); > + > + if (is_smc) { > + /* set the debug interface */ > + outer_cache.set_debug = pl310_set_debug; > + } Now, let's look at what pl310_set_debug() does: static void pl310_set_debug(unsigned long val) { writel_relaxed(val, l2x0_base + L2X0_DEBUG_CTRL); } Can you explain where the secure monitor call is there please, because I can't see one. In fact, this is the function used when there _isn't_ a secure monitor. So this patch just seems totally wrong to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html