On 01/24/2013 12:21 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> +
>> + i2c@12CC0000 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c@12CD0000 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c@121D0000 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>
> Why to disable these i2c devices here? Any particular reason?
> You can moves these to exynos5250.dtsi which is suppose to be common
> for all the exynos5250 platforms.
> Please see the exynos4.dtsi for reference.
>
Agreed. There was a discussion going on in [1] related to this. Since
there was no consensus on that, I preferred to go with the current
approach that is followed for other EXYNOS5250 based scripts.
If it is agreed by Kukjin to move to Exynos4 style, then I can submit
patches for that.
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg15013.html
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
