Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>
> On 12/24/2012 09:13 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>>> These two changes look good to me. For both of them:
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Well, I have another idea. Yes, I know, specific chip name should be
used.
> >> But
> >>> you know the specific chip name in compatible can cause another
> confusion
> >>> on other SoC which has same IP. So I think, we need to consider to use
> >>> common name or any specific name not chip in compatible for IP/driver
> like
> >>> following?
> >>>
> >>> - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos-dwc3" },
> >>> + { .compatible = "samsung,synopsis-dwc3" },
> >>>
> >>> Or if any version or something, how about following?
> >>>
> >>> + { .compatible = "samsung,dwc-v3" },
> >>>
> > Well, yes the newer SoCs with same IP using the chip name can cause some
> > confusion, but won't it be fine that -
> > "Newer parts using the same core can claim compatibility by
> > including the older string in the compatible list" - as quoted by Grant
Likely
> >
> > Or, can we try another option, using multiple compatible strings for
> > SoC specific
> > in of_match_table, so that we don't create any confusion by using same
> > compatible for newer SoCs also. Like,
> >
> > - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos-dwc3" },
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dwc3" },
> > + { .compatible =<new SoC using same IP> },
>
> Yes, why not just use an SoC name where given IP first appeared ? I
believe
> IP revision numbers are not always well documented. Also when an IP is
> instantiated multiple times in specific SoC, its revision number might not
> be sufficient to determine the system integration details for each
instance.
> I think having version for some devices and SoC name for others just adds
> to the confusion. Thus using specific chip name in the compatible property
> seems more clear to me.
>
Well, I don't think so. Let's see the DMAC PL330. Its compatible is
"arm,pl330" and "arm,primecell" not SoC/Chip name. I think DWC is a same
case or at least similar.
You know, the DWC is a IP from Synopsis and I _Believe_ it has a kind of
version and it can be used for identify.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
