Chen,Gang( ??) wrote: > > > > For subject: > > Please see the git log before your commit, it should be helpful to you. > > In this case, 'ARM: S5PV210: ...' is used. > > thank you, I should notice it next time. > an incorrect subject is not easy to get maintainer's notice > maybe it is the reason why you can not reply in time, since you can not notice it. > > :-) > Just I was busy ;-) sorry for late my reply. Anyway Gang, don't post with html typed e-mail, probably, you got some kind of error that your previous reply wasn't accepted from mailing list mail server. Please make sure that your e-mail is plain text type for mailing list. [...] > > I don't think so, because common.c in mach-s5pv210 should be built with > > selecting CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210, actually it depends on CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210 > > though. > > > > Any concerns, please let me know. > > ok, thank you. > and > is it suitable to delete the reletive code of " define NULL in common.h for s5pv210_* " ? > it seems they are wast. > Yes, right. We don't need more that. I missed it when I introduced common.[ch] local at the commit 3fa754c2. Thanks for pointing out and I will sort out. [...] Thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |