Hi Tomasz, On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On Tuesday 15 of January 2013 19:08:30 Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Adding OHCI device tree node for Exynos5250 along with >> the device base address. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt | 15 >> +++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | >> 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt index >> e8bbb47..f66fcdd 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt >> @@ -23,3 +23,18 @@ Example: >> interrupts = <0 71 0>; >> samsung,vbus-gpio = <&gpx2 6 1 3 3>; >> }; >> + >> +OHCI >> +Required properties: >> + - compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4210-ohci" for USB 2.0 >> + OHCI companion controller in host mode. >> + - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory >> mapped + region. >> + - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu. >> + >> +Example: >> + usb@12120000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci"; >> + reg = <0x12120000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 71 0>; >> + }; >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index 2cbe53e..ebb0907 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> @@ -281,6 +281,12 @@ >> interrupts = <0 71 0>; >> }; >> >> + usb@12120000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci"; >> + reg = <0x12120000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 71 0>; > > For Samsung platforms we decided per board enabling of nodes and so this > node should also contain: > > status = "disabled"; > > while in dts file of board using ohci there would be an overriding entry: > > usb@12120000 { > status = "okay"; > }; > Yes, i could see that for exynos4x dt. > I know that Exynos5250 has not been yet converted into this convention, > but using it when adding new devices will simplify the process. > Sure, will change this and other patches for usb as suggested. Thanks for the review. :-) -- Thanks & Regards Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html