Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: common: vic: Parse interrupt and resume masks from device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/2013 07:10 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch extends vic_of_init to parse valid interrupt sources
> and resume sources masks from device tree.
> 
> If mask values are not specified in device tree, all sources
> are assumed to be valid, as before this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt | 6 ++++++
>  arch/arm/common/vic.c                         | 7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt
> index 266716b..bb7137c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ Required properties:
>  Optional properties:
>  
>  - interrupts : Interrupt source for parent controllers if the VIC is nested.
> +- interrupt-mask : Bit mask of valid interrupt sources (defaults to all valid)

Can you explain why this is needed and is not just the OR of all
interrupts described in the DT?

> +- wakeup-mask : Bit mask of interrupt sources that can wake up the system
> +  (defaults to all allowed)

Seems like this would be all VIC interrupts unless the wake-up handling
is done in some shadow controller. If the former is true, then wake-up
capability is really a property of individual devices. If the later,
then this property would belong in that shadow controller.

Rob

>  
>  Example:
>  
> @@ -26,4 +29,7 @@ Example:
>  		interrupt-controller;
>  		#interrupt-cells = <1>;
>  		reg = <0x60000 0x1000>;
> +
> +		interrupt-mask = <0xffffff7f>;
> +		wakeup-mask = <0x0000ff7f>;
>  	};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
> index e4df17c..c2889da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
> @@ -407,6 +407,8 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
>  int __init vic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *regs;
> +	u32 interrupt_mask = ~0;
> +	u32 wakeup_mask = ~0;
>  
>  	if (WARN(parent, "non-root VICs are not supported"))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -415,10 +417,13 @@ int __init vic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>  	if (WARN_ON(!regs))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> +	of_property_read_u32(node, "interrupt-mask", &interrupt_mask);
> +	of_property_read_u32(node, "wakeup-mask", &wakeup_mask);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Passing -1 as first IRQ makes the simple domain allocate descriptors
>  	 */
> -	__vic_init(regs, -1, ~0, ~0, node);
> +	__vic_init(regs, -1, interrupt_mask, wakeup_mask, node);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux