Hi Guennadi,
On 01/02/2013 12:31 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Sylwester
Thanks for picking up these patches! In general both look good to me, just
a couple of nit-picks, that I couldn't help remarking:-)
Sure, thanks again for the feedback.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski<g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
This patch adds a document describing common OF bindings for video
capture, output and video processing devices. It is curently mainly
focused on video capture devices, with data busses defined by
standards like ITU-R BT.656 or MIPI-CSI2.
It also documents a method of describing data links between devices.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski<g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki<s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This is basically a resend of my previous version of this patch [1],
with just a few typo/grammar issue corrections.
[1] http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15911/
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 198 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d1eea35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+Common bindings for video data receiver and transmitter interfaces
+
+General concept
+---------------
+
+Video data pipelines usually consist of external devices, e.g. camera sensors,
+controlled over an I2C, SPI or UART bus, and SoC internal IP blocks, including
+video DMA engines and video data processors.
+
+SoC internal blocks are described by DT nodes, placed similarly to other SoC
+blocks. External devices are represented as child nodes of their respective
+bus controller nodes, e.g. I2C.
+
+Data interfaces on all video devices are described by their child 'port' nodes.
+Configuration of a port depends on other devices participating in the data
+transfer and is described by 'endpoint' subnodes.
+
+dev {
+ #address-cells =<1>;
+ #size-cells =<0>;
+ port@0 {
+ endpoint@0 { ... };
+ endpoint@1 { ... };
+ };
+ port@1 { ... };
+};
+
+If a port can be configured to work with more than one other device on the same
+bus, an 'endpoint' child node must be provided for each of them. If more than
+one port is present in a device node or there is more than one endpoint at a
+port, a common scheme, using '#address-cells', '#size-cells' and 'reg' properties
+is used.
+
+Two 'endpoint' nodes are linked with each other through their 'remote-endpoint'
+phandles. An endpoint subnode of a device contains all properties needed for
+configuration of this device for data exchange with the other device. In most
+cases properties at the peer 'endpoint' nodes will be identical, however
+they might need to be different when there is any signal modifications on the
+bus between two devices, e.g. there are logic signal inverters on the lines.
+
+Required properties
+-------------------
+
+If there is more than one 'port' or more than one 'endpoint' node following
+properties are required in relevant parent node:
+
+- #address-cells : number of cells required to define port number, should be 1.
+- #size-cells : should be zero.
+
+Optional endpoint properties
+----------------------------
+
+- remote-endpoint : phandle to an 'endpoint' subnode of the other device node.
This spacing before ":" looks strange to me. I personally prefer the
normal English rule - "x: y," i.e. no space before and a space after, but
I wouldn't remark on your choice of a space on each side in this specific
case, if it was consistent. Whereas sometimes having one space and
sometimes having none looks weird to me. I would go for "no space before
':'" throughout this document.
Gah, it was so close! ;) Sorry about it, it looked more readable to me
that way.
And I've checked other bindings' documentation and there was many files
having
space on both sides of a colon. Nevertheless, I will change it back to the
original form.
+- slave-mode : a boolean property, run the link in slave mode. Default is master
+ mode.
+- bus-width : number of data lines, valid for parallel buses.
As we discussed before, both "busses" and "buses" spellings are commonly
used at different locations around the world, but I think we should stick
to only one of them in a single document. It looks weird to have "buses"
in one line and "busses" in the following one.
True, I think that was the one occurrence I'd noticed and have forgotten to
correct then. I'll fix it, thanks for pointing out.
+- data-shift: on parallel data busses, if bus-width is used to specify the
+ number of data lines, data-shift can be used to specify which data lines are
+ used, e.g. "bus-width=<10>; data-shift=<2>;" means, that lines 9:2 are used.
+- hsync-active : active state of HSYNC signal, 0/1 for LOW/HIGH respectively.
+- vsync-active : active state of VSYNC signal, 0/1 for LOW/HIGH respectively.
+ Note, that if HSYNC and VSYNC polarities are not specified, embedded
+ synchronization may be required, where supported.
+- data-active : similar to HSYNC and VSYNC, specifies data line polarity.
+- field-even-active: field signal level during the even field data transmission.
+- pclk-sample : rising (1) or falling (0) edge to sample the pixel clock signal.
Yes, it was in my original document too, but don't we mean "sample data on
rising (1) or falling (0) edge of the pixel clock signal?"
Oops, I've managed to overlooked this. Certainly, it wasn't supposed to mean
sampling the clock signal. BTW, I had some doubts about this property.
On the
transmitter side we more care about driving, rather than sampling data. And
usually when a transmitter drives data line at one clock edge type (e.g.
rising)
then the receiver samples data on the other edge (e.g. falling).
In the display timing bindings there is a definitions like:
+ - pixelclk-active: with
+ - active high = drive pixel data on rising edge/
+ sample data on falling edge
+ - active low = drive pixel data on falling edge/
+ sample data on rising edge
+ - ignored = ignored
where:
+ <1>: high active
+ <0>: low active
+ omitted: not used on hardware
Then in our case, e.g. pclk-sample = <1>; on the transmitter side would mean
the receiver, which also has same pclk-sample = <1>; specified in its node,
has to sample data on rising clock edge and the transmitter is driving data
on falling edge, right ?
---
Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
