Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 10:23:17 schrieb Alexander Varnin: > Is it ok, to send only one last patch after changes, without the one, > who make macro? I'd think so, as this series isn't this big. Just include a version into the patch subject, i.e. [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: S3C2443: Workaround for 2443 EXTINT error to denote the most recent version and include a short summary of the changes _after_ the "---" of the main commit message. > 26.11.2012 13:12, Heiko Stübner пишет: > > Hi Alexander, > > > > I think this patch needs a bit more love :-) . > > > > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on it and fix all the reported problems. > > > > And I'd change the comment to something like: > > > > /* > > > > * S3C2443 CPU has a problem with EXTINTn registers. > > * Essentially register-reads return transformed data, but the write > > * is done according to the datasheet. > > * > > * Fix this by transforming the read data to the correct format. > > * > > * For details refer to the document "S3C2443 GUIDE TO EXTRA GPIO" > > */ > > > > Especially the mail address does not need to be in the code - the git > > history preserves the committer identity quite well. > > > > > > Heiko > > > > Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 09:44:41 schrieb Alexander Varnin: > >> S3C2443 CPU has a problem with incorrect reading from EXTINTn > >> registers. So s3c_irqext_type function wrongly modifies them. > >> So add special check to s3c_irqext_type, to handle this case. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Varnin <fenixk19@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c > >> index fe57bbb..ed19996 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c > >> @@ -219,6 +219,32 @@ s3c_irqext_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int > >> type) } > >> > >> value = __raw_readl(extint_reg); > >> > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * S3C2443 CPU has a problem with EXTINTn registers. > >> + * Essentially register-reads returned transformed data, but the write > >> + * is done according to the datasheet. > >> + * > >> + * There is hack introduced for 2443 error workaround. > >> + * > >> + * For detais refer to the document "S3C2443 GUIDE TO EXTRA GPIO" found > >> on the web. + * > >> + * A. Varnin <fenixk19@xxxxxxx> > >> + */ > >> + if(soc_is_s3c2443()) > >> + { > >> + int i; > >> + int fixed = 0; > >> + if(extint_reg == S3C24XX_EXTINT1 || extint_reg == S3C24XX_EXTINT2) > >> + for(i=0; i<7;i++) > >> + fixed |= (((value >> ((7-i)*4+1)) & 7) | ((value >> ((7- > > > > i)*4-3)) & > > > >> 8)) << i*4; + else > >> + for(i=0; i<7;i++) > >> + fixed |= ( (value >> (7-i)*4) & 0xf ) << i*4; > >> + fixed |= (((value>>1) & 7) | ((value<<3) & 8)) << 27; > >> + value = fixed; > >> + } > >> + > >> > >> value = (value & ~(7 << extint_offset)) | (newvalue << > >> extint_offset); __raw_writel(value, extint_reg); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html