Op 08-11-12 21:23, Sasha Levin schreef: > Just use BUG_ON() instead of constructions such as: > > if (...) > BUG() > > A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation > is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // <smpl> > @@ > expression e; > @@ > - if (e) BUG(); > + BUG_ON(e); > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > index 4e577f6..6a55a5a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > @@ -465,10 +465,8 @@ static void __init combiner_cascade_irq(unsigned int combiner_nr, unsigned int i > else > max_nr = EXYNOS4_MAX_COMBINER_NR; > > - if (combiner_nr >= max_nr) > - BUG(); > - if (irq_set_handler_data(irq, &combiner_data[combiner_nr]) != 0) > - BUG(); > + BUG_ON(combiner_nr >= max_nr); > + BUG_ON(irq_set_handler_data(irq, &combiner_data[combiner_nr]) != 0); Is it really a good idea to put functions that perform work in a BUG_ON? I don't know, but for some reason it just feels wrong. I'd expect code to compile fine if BUG_ON was a noop, so doing verification calls only, not actual work.. ~Maarten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |